
- IPAT did not have capacity to potentially engage with challenges to reception rights, due to already operating at a reduced level due to the Department of Justice not providing necessary resources to effectively operate IPAT, which they had previously agreed to provide; and,
- Questioned whether extending IPAT’s jurisdiction over reception rights was lawful, in light of the International Protection Act 2015, which only permits IPAT to determine, on appeal, protection claims. On this issue, this concern is lessened by the fact that the 2018 Regulations explicitly extended jurisdiction to IPAT on certain reception rights matters (on appeal), and this may be viewed as an act done ‘necessitated by‘ Ireland’s obligations under the Reception Conditions Directive (Recast) 2013.
- Several other concerns on the precise operation of protection applicants appeal rights under the 2018 Regulations.
I do hope the decision database will assist legal practitioners and persons seeking protection in challenging decisions under the 2018 Regulations.
Liam is an associate professor in UCD School of Law.

